Ramanujam's proof!!.... can u find any flaws??
Can U Prove 3=2??
This seems to be an anomaly or whatever u call in mathematics.
It seems, Ram anujam found it but never disclosed it during his life time
and that it has been found from his dairy.
See this illustration:
-6 = -6
9-15 = 4-10
adding 25/4 to both sides:
9-15+(25/4) = 4-10+(25/4 )
Changing the order
9+(25/4)-15 = 4+(25/4)-10
(this is just like : a square + b square - two a b = (a-b)square. )
Here a = 3, b=5/2 for L.H.S and a =2, b=5/2 for R.H.S.
So it can be expressed as follows:
(3-5/2)(3-5/ 2) = (2-5/2)(2-5/ 2)
Taking positive square root on both sides:
3 - 5/2 = 2 - 5/2
3 = 2
ANY FLAWS??????? ???????
flaws?? dat's rediculous... there is a lst of flaws.....
ReplyDelete1)as there is no proportional variable given u cannot concider.. -6 as ref. as X or ny variable is not der
2)as fraction is added to bth sides.. v cannot get chge da order.. as rule suggests.. & if v chged it den.. da final ans vil be chged... in bth ways... 17/4.. L.H.S.... and 21/4... RHS.. so it goes wrong.. frm dat aspect too..
3)& if a person is still getin da ans.. wid variables a & b... then how he 'll multiply... da damn same no as coeffecients.. of a r different..
4) also if sm one... wants da ans.. in by removing all des prospects... he can simply.. cancell.. 5/2 frm both side....(xtremist).. but if he does so den... 3=2 but.. it would.. of same variable.. (a)
which is completely... wrong....
So these r da suspected flaws.. as u r asked.... for dat... these a complete fluke & flawless.....